Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Hyper-Visual

Reading visually.  These two words seem at odds with one another, however, it is quite apparent that of course we "read" images, pictures, motion, etc.  McCloud's chapters were sort of an eye opener for me.  I actually really don't care for comics.  I have never seen the point and I really don't like the little boxes - they always seem so confining.  But McCloud made me think "outside the box" in a way that I had never considered.  I don't think I am going to go pick up a comic book anytime soon, but I can definitely say I will give the boxes more thought the next time I have a chance encounter.  I was particularly drawn to his discussion about the accessibility of the cartoon image.  As an image becomes more cartoonish, we are more likely to assign our own meaning and identify with the character - there is a certain "universality of cartoon imagery" (p. 31).   He made a really profound point about our self-centeredness when he states, "We see ourselves in everything.  We assign identities and emotions where none exist.  And we make the world over in our image" (p. 33).  Even as I quote these sentences - these words that he has strung together to convey a message - part of the message and profundity is lost without the imagery. 

 This idea was brought home after viewing the class A/V projects.  If part of the structure is missing, say no music or blurry text, the message is altered to either mean something else or have no meaning at all.  If I can't see "myself" in something, I am unlikely to identify or become emotionally involved with that something.  In particular, Matt's piece A Video About Sidewalks, is a terrific example of bringing alphabet, image, video and sound to convey a simple, yet seemingly complicated subject.  Why is a sidewalk something I should care about?  Matt provides a soundtrack and images that make me want to care.  His use of carefully chosen alphabetic text further provide his audience with the facts that he wants us to understand and use to come to a conclusion.  As he states in his post, "sidewalks aren't very sexy" but they are integral to a healthy community in the form of increased health, lower crime rates, and maybe a few less abandoned couches on the curb.  All of these observations and information were contained in a 2.5 minute short that makes me want to care that his neighborhood doesn't have sidewalks.  His rhetoric indeed has persuaded me to consider an issue that I had no idea I cared about.  If he had left out the alphabetic text and maybe just provided his audience with video of missing sidewalk, I don't think his message would have been as convincing. 

Which brings me to Sosnoski's piece Hyper-readers & Their Reading Engines.  Sosnoski says, "...reading is a highly selective process, one in which the majority of details are forgotten..." (p 165).  He also states that "graphics often play a more meaningful role than words" (p. 169).  Matt's graphic presentation summarizes a complex issue that in my mind is more meaningful than a carefully prepared oped in the Comicle.  He obviously had much more information that could have been included, yet the simplicity and directness of the video conveys the message in a way that will not be forgotten.  Matt has created a conceptual framework with his choice of music, video and alphabetic text in which I can understand his message and come to a conclusion about the importance of something as ubiquitous as a sidewalk. 

McCloud provides us with a very helpful triangular analytical tool for dissecting the "pictorial vocabulary."  The vertices are reality, language and the picture plane.  He points out that in comics, there seems to be a divide between received information (pictorial content) and perceived information writing/language content) and asks if the two sides can be reconciled.  I think Sosnoski believes that these two sides inevitably will be reconciled.  As many of us have blogged about throughout the course, today's techie generation demands digital communication and the ability to "filter, skim and peck."  He says, "...hyper-readers feel liberated from the constraints of such textual guidelines and feel that they are now free to organize textual features in patterns relevant to their own concerns..." (p. 172).  To me, Matt's video emphasizes Sosnoski's point.  Through multimedia, Matt is able to convey a message in a pictorial vocabulary in which I, the hyper-reader, am able to organize the information in a pattern that is relevant to my concerns.  I am able to empathize and respond more deeply because his message is acceptable on my terms. 

6 comments:

  1. McCloud and your post reminded me that when I was a kid, my folks found Doonesbury really funny. I never could understand what was funny about it. They would say it was "political." So with interdependence, I could see where they have no appeal despite being "a more perfect means to communicate." Maybe they weren't supposed to be funny, but I had expectations? IDK

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad to see you liked the video Stephanie. It was cool to see it put into context with the readings. I definitely am coming around to the fact that pictures, music and video are a compliment to the text in a digital setting. You're right, I probably wouldn't have been able to portray the desired pathos without the music and video.

    Still, I am sure that there are some who would view my video and criticize it for its use of these elements. I'm sure SWIMBIA (http://www.swmbia.org/#bf_miniCal_180) would decry my work as a piece of propaganda designed to stifle growth and punish developers in some hidden leftist agenda.

    I was listening to the radio the other day and they were talking about Obama's "Road We've Traveled" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibVeApg_Zcc) video. Critics of this video said that it was using pictures and images as "merely a distraction" from the shortcomings of Obama's economic policies. Those on Obama's side would say it's an educational piece of rhetoric, using pictures to convey a message that couldn't fully be delivered with words. I would say it's both. It's rhetoric, after all. So much is tied up in simply an image of an American flag and its use in a piece of rhetoric says so many things that it can be interpreted a million different ways.

    The end of the sidewalk means just many things. It has worldwide implications. It's amazing to think about how Greece, a country I've never visited, can impact where I walk here in west Bozeman, Montana. But the world economy can now dictate such simple things that we often take for granted. The web of context is amazingly complex. And while rhetoric can run down the strands of that web, it rarely finds itself in the middle, radiating outwardly toward all the sources of that context. It can only occupy so many channels at once. Trying to be everything to everyone is nearly impossible. But for now, I suppose I'm happy to have affected thought in a few of my classmates.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You make a great point regarding the Obama YouTube video. I think it was Doug who said for many of us, when we here the word "rhetoric", we automatically think of manipulation or political bullshit. That by using emotional images the Obama camp is somehow avoiding the "real" issues by glossing them over with a pretty video. The message, I suppose, can only be interpreted in the way in which we are capable which indeed means 7 billion ways!

    I have had the great pleasure(dripping in sarcasm) of attending a few SWMBIA meetings and would have to agree that the organization would consider the sidewalk issue as a hinderance to progress. However, I really do think SWMBIA could benefit from seeing the issue from the point of view of the family that actually lives in these communities. I think your multimedia presentation effectively offers a unique perspective in a way that could influence their behavior which is what good rhetoric is supposed to do! Nicely done!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the point at the outset of the post, the oddity of 'reading visually.' I think that's an important point to make, and it jives with the readings for this week nicely, especially McCloud. And quickly, the point Matt made about the American flag being interpreted in 'a million different ways,' I think is very important, because many symbols like that, and many words are incredibly loaded. I wonder if that's a bit of a constraint on a rhetor, possibly an advantage, or simultaneously a good and bad influence.
    But I really wanted to comment on the boxes that comics use, the 'panels.' I see your point, and I know that it has been echoed by some who write comics. It has been said by Bill Watterson, for example, that comics in newspapers have shrunk over the years, where once there was 1/4 and 1/2 pages to work with, there is now one line consisting of maybe four panels if a cartoonist is lucky. Enough time for all of a pun at best. And Watterson in particular, was one who would break those boundaries, draw whole pages, landscapes, etc, that destroyed what seems like the conventional, boring boxes. He would periodically remove those boxes and allow his characters to roam 'free.' It does affect the cartoon drastically, as you hint at. Must seem a trivial matter to point out, but I think it's an important point relative to the McCloud reading specifically. I like that you included that in your post!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Love this discussion, y'all, and Stephanie, I have to say, that was a fantastic blog post -- especially the conclusion you reach. Really nicely done.

    ReplyDelete